¤W¤@¥DÃD¤U¤@¥DÃD
«12345»Pages: 3/5     Go
¨¾µs¥[»\«D¥D¬y¶l¬F¤å¨ã
¯Å§O: ¤ä§½ªø
UID: 40
ºëµØ: 4
µo©«: 752
¤É¯ÅÂI¼Æ: 1042 ÂI
ª÷¿ú: 2744 ª÷¹ô
¦b½u®É¶¡: 434(®É)
ª`¥U®É¶¡: 2005-08-16
³Ì«áµn¿ý: 2025-01-06
20¼Ó  µoªí¤_: 2013-10-29 12:24

Re:¦^ 74¼Ó(swift) ªº©«¤l

¤Þ¥Î
¤Þ¥Î²Ä75¼Óming8686¤_2013-10-29 08:56µoªíªº ¦^ 74¼Ó(swift) ªº©«¤l :
Swift¥S,

I'm sure I can find it. Thanks for the tip.

°¸º¸¤]·|¶R°ÝÃD²¼. ³o±i¤p¦r¥[»\¯¶¶Z¤@¶êªº¡¨¤y¡¨³¡¥÷©M¨â­Ó¹s¦n¹³¬O³Q¬YºØ·»¾¯®ø±¼ªº. °O±o«Ü¤[¥H«e´N¦³±Mªù¥h±¼­ì¤lµ§ªo¾¥ªºªF¦è(hairspray can also do the trick). ²{¦b¬O§_¦³¤°»ò·»¾¯¥i¥H®ø±¼¥[»\ªºªo¾¥¦ý¤S¤£¼vÅT­ì²¼. ¤p§Ì¥u·Qª¾¹D³oºØ§Þ³N¦s¤£¦s¦b,¤£¶·ª¾¹D·»¾¯¦WºÙ.


¨S¨£¹LÃþ¦üªº¡A¦ý¬O¨â­Ó¡u0¡vÁÙ¦³¼v¤l¡AµLªk±Æ°£¬O¥[¤u¹L¡C
¨¾µs¥[»\«D¥D¬y¶l¬F¤å¨ã
¯Å§O: ¤ä§½ªø
UID: 40
ºëµØ: 4
µo©«: 752
¤É¯ÅÂI¼Æ: 1042 ÂI
ª÷¿ú: 2744 ª÷¹ô
¦b½u®É¶¡: 434(®É)
ª`¥U®É¶¡: 2005-08-16
³Ì«áµn¿ý: 2025-01-06
21¼Ó  µoªí¤_: 2013-10-29 20:20

These "products" were meant to deceive novice collectors. Forgive me for being too straightforward. I would not consider these altered stamps deserve any study. They can be used as a negetive example, at most.
¨¾µs¥[»\«D¥D¬y¶l¬F¤å¨ã
¯Å§O: ¤ä§½ªø
UID: 40
ºëµØ: 4
µo©«: 752
¤É¯ÅÂI¼Æ: 1042 ÂI
ª÷¿ú: 2744 ª÷¹ô
¦b½u®É¶¡: 434(®É)
ª`¥U®É¶¡: 2005-08-16
³Ì«áµn¿ý: 2025-01-06
22¼Ó  µoªí¤_: 2013-10-29 22:34

Re:¦^ 79¼Ó(swift) ªº©«¤l

¤Þ¥Î
¤Þ¥Î²Ä80¼Óming8686¤_2013-10-29 21:10µoªíªº ¦^ 79¼Ó(swift) ªº©«¤l :
Sorry, maybe that is not a good thing to talk about here. I just removed the second picture.
I highly suspected that they were altered stamps when I acquired them. I collected them to see what technique people can do currently. These two examples are the ones that are easier to spot. I guess I'm the only few collecting this kind of stuff. I posted the pictures here not to confuse peopel, just for reference.It seems to me that this topic is too sensitive, I should stop right here.

If the overprint can be wiped completely and undetectedly, that would be very scary. A fellow from APS local club told me few years ago that anything is possible now. He had seen one that he could not tell it's been altered and yet he is an expert on altered stamps.

.......


My words might be too strong. We are facing the dilemma of calling collector's attention and help improving techniques for making fakes. My suggestion is totally ignoring these obvious fakes. High quality fakes of the unissued silver yuen (see the note under Scott #984-987) stamps exist. I hate to say it but it seems sooner or later dangerous fake of flying geese without denomination may appear. I do wish they appear as late as possible. Frankly, I condemn those who sell fake stamps on eBay even though the sellers clearly say those are reproductions. We never know where those fake stamps will end up. At the end the hobby gets hurt.
¨¾µs¥[»\«D¥D¬y¶l¬F¤å¨ã
¯Å§O: ¤ä§½ªø
UID: 40
ºëµØ: 4
µo©«: 752
¤É¯ÅÂI¼Æ: 1042 ÂI
ª÷¿ú: 2744 ª÷¹ô
¦b½u®É¶¡: 434(®É)
ª`¥U®É¶¡: 2005-08-16
³Ì«áµn¿ý: 2025-01-06
23¼Ó  µoªí¤_: 2013-10-29 23:36

There is a famous book for this.

¨¾µs¥[»\«D¥D¬y¶l¬F¤å¨ã
¯Å§O: ¤ä§½ªø
UID: 40
ºëµØ: 4
µo©«: 752
¤É¯ÅÂI¼Æ: 1042 ÂI
ª÷¿ú: 2744 ª÷¹ô
¦b½u®É¶¡: 434(®É)
ª`¥U®É¶¡: 2005-08-16
³Ì«áµn¿ý: 2025-01-06
24¼Ó  µoªí¤_: 2013-10-30 12:51

Schmid's book is old. Obviously, some newer technologies are not included in there.

There exists even older books (unfortunately the title is not in my head) in the counterfeit detecting topic. For example, the early Shanghai large dragons were studied in the first part of 20th century. Some "private reproductions" back then have become classic reference. If someone would like to put into efforts, I believe the China large dragons are another suitable candidate for counterfeit study. (If one ever pays attention to large dragons, he or she would find that the market has been upset by high quality fakes.)
¨¾µs¥[»\«D¥D¬y¶l¬F¤å¨ã
¯Å§O: ¤ä§½ªø
UID: 40
ºëµØ: 4
µo©«: 752
¤É¯ÅÂI¼Æ: 1042 ÂI
ª÷¿ú: 2744 ª÷¹ô
¦b½u®É¶¡: 434(®É)
ª`¥U®É¶¡: 2005-08-16
³Ì«áµn¿ý: 2025-01-06
25¼Ó  µoªí¤_: 2013-10-31 00:02

Very interesting sites. Thanks.
¨¾µs¥[»\«D¥D¬y¶l¬F¤å¨ã
¯Å§O: ¤ä§½ªø
UID: 40
ºëµØ: 4
µo©«: 752
¤É¯ÅÂI¼Æ: 1042 ÂI
ª÷¿ú: 2744 ª÷¹ô
¦b½u®É¶¡: 434(®É)
ª`¥U®É¶¡: 2005-08-16
³Ì«áµn¿ý: 2025-01-06
26¼Ó  µoªí¤_: 2013-10-31 10:05

ÂI¦b¾î¤W¡A¤Ö¨£¡C
¨¾µs¥[»\«D¥D¬y¶l¬F¤å¨ã
¯Å§O: ¤ä§½ªø
UID: 40
ºëµØ: 4
µo©«: 752
¤É¯ÅÂI¼Æ: 1042 ÂI
ª÷¿ú: 2744 ª÷¹ô
¦b½u®É¶¡: 434(®É)
ª`¥U®É¶¡: 2005-08-16
³Ì«áµn¿ý: 2025-01-06
27¼Ó  µoªí¤_: 2013-10-31 12:53

You are very luck. The original picture did not seem to have good resolution  to clearly show it.

This type of overprint is indeed very rare. A few famous collector in this area, including Paul Chang, did not have a chance to buy mint copies from postal office. It seems that these stamps appeared in some small postal office in central Taiwan and remained unnoticed for a while.
¨¾µs¥[»\«D¥D¬y¶l¬F¤å¨ã
¯Å§O: ¤ä§½ªø
UID: 40
ºëµØ: 4
µo©«: 752
¤É¯ÅÂI¼Æ: 1042 ÂI
ª÷¿ú: 2744 ª÷¹ô
¦b½u®É¶¡: 434(®É)
ª`¥U®É¶¡: 2005-08-16
³Ì«áµn¿ý: 2025-01-06
28¼Ó  µoªí¤_: 2013-11-01 20:49

Don't know much about major rarities about this issue. They cost too much.
¨¾µs¥[»\«D¥D¬y¶l¬F¤å¨ã
¯Å§O: ¤ä§½ªø
UID: 40
ºëµØ: 4
µo©«: 752
¤É¯ÅÂI¼Æ: 1042 ÂI
ª÷¿ú: 2744 ª÷¹ô
¦b½u®É¶¡: 434(®É)
ª`¥U®É¶¡: 2005-08-16
³Ì«áµn¿ý: 2025-01-06
29¼Ó  µoªí¤_: 2013-11-02 15:42

¤Þ¥Î
¤Þ¥Î²Ä96¼Óilan69¤_2013-11-02 15:33µoªíªº  :


ming8686¥S¯u¬O©¯¹B¡AÃø±oªº¡y°ªÂI2¡z¡Aªþ¤W·í®ÉEBAY©ç½æ¤Wªºªþ¹Ï¡A¨S¤H¬Ý¨ì³oªT¡y°ªÂI2¡z¡C

[attachment=153161]
.......

¤£¥u©¯¹B,¬O©¯¹B¤¤ªº©¯¹B¡C
¤W¤@¥DÃD¤U¤@¥DÃD
«12345»Pages: 3/5     Go