此封從葡萄牙1991年1月11日以航空掛號寄出. 貼了兩張小全及一些散票,判斷是集郵人士寄的.背面銷了八個戳. 國外戳不談, 國內銷1月17日台北未37戳3次(可能第一,二次銷的不清楚), 18日再銷一支甲戳. 查鐘火盛書, 時間與戳型(最晚民國77年12月,晚幾個月或有可能,但差太遠,戳為W型)皆不符, 所以應是郵聯戳. 背面又貼一張中文籤條(箭頭處,已被撕去)
請問前輩為何銷未與甲戳? 一支甲戳應是多餘的吧? 籤條功能又為何? 用來簽名?在美國是簽在另一張卡上.
正面”航空”二字是個疑點,是貼上去的紙條. 未戳有可能是假的嗎?仔細觀察兩個未字不太一樣.

台北未37戳是聯郵戳
一般航掛實寄台灣的
到台灣後由航郵中心銷蓋兩個未32或申33戳
停止郵檢後改銷其他戳
收件人是台北一支局的信箱租戶
因此一支局接到台北局轉來後再銷一支甲戳
同時在背面貼上掛號收據紙條
當收件人領取該掛件時
須在掛號收據紙條上蓋章
後由一支局人員將收據紙條撕下留存
以上就是其流程及手續
普通不集郵的是不會花時間黏貼那麼多的小全張和郵票
該封不值得做假

至於航空戳印小貼紙
有可能是收件人提供給寄件人貼用
細節可能要由收寄件人說明才最正確

謝謝tmh前輩的解說.

請問這是南投縣埔里鎮蜈蚣里嗎?從來不知有此地名.

是的,差一點就漂亮的代戳

http://nt.village.tnn.tw/village05.html?id=154

Flying geese overprint cover.

Franked with two one-dollar narrow-space Flying geese overprints (1st print), 5 cents Northeast 44 dollar surcharged and farm product 10 cents surcharged , tied by TAIPEI CDS of 1950.1.5
Cover was sent to Hamburg Germany without arrival CDS. Stamps were on the back side of the cover - bad idea.
If the CDS was 3 days earlier, it would have made this cover very unusual. At least, it was used during 'that" week. There is a cover in Paul Chang's book shown the exact date but that cover is way better than this one..

P.S. 1950.1.1 was Sunday.

Sorry, this is a duplicated page. Deleted. 

This would have been a very nice cover without missing a stamp.

Hi Swift,

Nothing can be hidden from a Pro like you.

I did send a message to the seller asking about the void area and a possible missing stamp before I bid. The seller replied "bid accordingly!". I got it at relatively low price. Guess a lot people noiced that too.

Since the cover could be an eye sore to someone, is it better to remove the stamps and put them in an album?

Sorry, this is the second time I asked you the same question.